3) “The possibility of indoctrination cannot be a reason for undermining personal autonomy.” Comment. (150 Words)

Recently, Hadiya case was unique, before the Supreme court judges; surely a fight between indoctrination and personal autonomy. Judges also opined: Hadiya has her own personal autonomy, she need not depend on her husband as guardian (even if she consents that she married her not because of compulsion, but of her own will, she was not forcibly indoctrinated). So, according to this example, personal autonomy can not be undermined, even if there has been several allegations that she has been forcibly indoctrinated.