Recently, Hadiya case was unique, before the Supreme court judges; surely a fight between indoctrination and personal autonomy. Judges also opined: Hadiya has her own personal autonomy, she need not depend on her husband as guardian (even if she consents that she married her not because of compulsion, but of her own will, she was not forcibly indoctrinated). So, according to this example, personal autonomy can not be undermined, even if there has been several allegations that she has been forcibly indoctrinated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
First post in 2026
This is my first post in 2026. Lot happened by in year 2025. Many things I learnt, unlearnt. Sometimes I don't know myself what I want ...
-
Is duniya me kho se gue hum, Apna Vajood pehchan na paaye hum Chubhte hue kaanto me apne seene ko paya har dam, lahu nikalta raha laal rang...
-
Negativity and failure Negativity breeds upon failures. Once a failure is experienced it creates a false impression in mind that a next ...
-
I am no Kierkegaard or Nietsche or even Socrates, who is here to comment on the failure and success. I am also not here to give you mantras ...
No comments:
Post a Comment